Subject: Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-19 23:54:45
> Sorry for my poor English,
> Apparently, people understood the exact opposite of what I wanted to say.
FWIW, and IMO, your post was very good in laying out what dropping support
for C++03 would mean.
I'd only take exception to "a library can start using C++11 without warning
and this is not considered a breaking change". That's like saying "1+1 is
not considered 2". It's not a matter of consideration; if a change breaks
code, it's a breaking change, regardless of whether one considers it to be
It's generally up to the maintainer to decide how to proceed with breaking
changes, whether caused by switching to C++11 or otherwise changing things
in an incompatible way. ("It's generally up to the maintainer" is true for
mostly everything in Boost, including whether to support C++03 or not.)
We don't break code without a good reason not because of administrative
rules and policies that forbid us from doing so; we don't break code without
a good reason because this creates needless problems for our users and
tarnishes our reputation and our brand.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk