Subject: Re: [boost] [graph][graph_parallel][disjoint_sets] Of dependencies and "pending" libraries.
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-04-21 16:09:33
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 11:02 AM Peter Dimov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Rene Rivera wrote:
> > > but graph_parallel was separated from graph because it represented
> > > depencendies which a user of graph need not have.
> > That almost makes sense ;-) I say that because graph depends on
> > graph_parallel. I know it doesn't if you don't happen to include some
> > specific headers. But we've already gone over the module level
> > discussions.
> As far as I can see, Graph includes headers from Graph_parallel only when
> BOOST_GRAPH_USE_MPI is defined.
Interesting.. but doesn't help the module level dependency problem. Maybe
those graph mpi headers should move to graph_parallel?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk