Re: [boost] Proposal for a thread synchronisation primitive: future_queue

Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal for a thread synchronisation primitive: future_queue
From: Martin Hierholzer (martin.christoph.hierholzer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-04-26 17:04:38

Dear Viktor, 

thank you very much for your feedback! 

> I like the idea. Btw, why isn't the has_data() named empty() to conform with stl
> containers?

Good point. I just changed this. 

> Also it would be nice to have the member functions documented in the readme
> also. (I might be missing something though).

I have now added a second .md file containing the reference documentation of all member and non-member functions. It is linked in the README.md file. 

Cheers, 
Martin