Re: [boost] PR: Remove safe_bool idiom from boost.tribool

Subject: Re: [boost] PR: Remove safe_bool idiom from boost.tribool
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-05-19 14:14:47

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:55 PM, degski via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Other logic "systems" are applicable:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-valued_logic

If you are proposing that we leave boost::tribool alone for legacy
reasons, and then add boost::trilean which addresses the semantic
deficiencies in tribool in a manner consistent with trilean logic,
then I'm on board. I will make the necessary changes to Beast (which
currently uses tribool).

Regards