Subject: Re: [boost] Strange libstdc++ versions in travis-ci testers
From: Stefan Seefeld (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-06-28 19:56:07
On 2018-06-28 03:42 PM, Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost wrote:
> 2018-06-28 21:27 GMT+02:00 Stefan Seefeld via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>:
>> On 2018-06-28 03:14 PM, Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost wrote:
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>> Maybe someone could help me understand the configuration on the travis-ci
>> For avoidance of doubt: what exactly are you referring to by "the
>> travis-ci testers" ? Lots of Boost projects use their own CI configuration,
>> so there is a huge variance on compilers and runtimes being used, some
>> supporting C++11, some not.
> This is interesting. I am referring to Boost.Opitonal tests on Travis
> configured here: https://travis-ci.org/boostorg/optional
> I am a maintainer of Boost.Optional, and I never configured these tests.
> They were not there a year ago, and at some point I started receiving test
> results from this site upon every commit. So I assume there must have been
> a Boost-wide initiative to put additional tests there. I assume that
> someone on the list might have taken part in configuring them, and may know
> the answers.
I'm maintaining a few Boost projects, too. And I would be most concerned
if someone started to add stuff into "my" repos without first discussing
it with me.
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk