Subject: Re: [boost] ABI issues with -std
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-08-20 08:32:53
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:23 AM, Andrey Semashev via Boost
>>> As a slightly different variant of the Boost.System2 solution, I can
>>> suggest building multiple Boost.System binaries, one per ABI we can
>> That'd require library name mangling on Linux and adding the std level
>> to the name..
> Not necessarilly. The base name of Boost.System with the new ABI could be
Wouldn't that require all reverse dependencies to do the same?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk