Subject: Re: [boost] ABI issues with -std
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-08-20 08:45:27
On 08/20/18 11:32, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:23 AM, Andrey Semashev via Boost
> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>> As a slightly different variant of the Boost.System2 solution, I can
>>>> suggest building multiple Boost.System binaries, one per ABI we can
>>> That'd require library name mangling on Linux and adding the std level
>>> to the name..
>> Not necessarilly. The base name of Boost.System with the new ABI could be
> Wouldn't that require all reverse dependencies to do the same?
Yes, I suppose so. With Boost.System being a core library, I agree that
automatic name mangling would make it easier.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk