Subject: Re: [boost] Let's stop distributing binaries
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-08-29 15:12:52
On 8/29/2018 10:53 AM, Robert Ramey via Boost wrote:
> The fact is that users of boost use compilers with differing levels of
> C++ standard conformance.Â This creates a number of problems including
> (but probably not limited to)
> a) Using libraries built with different levels of C++ conformance may
> create ABI issues.
> b) it creates a discussion about "dropping C++03 support".Â Actually it
> creates a discussion about that the above actually means.
> c) It's motivated a suggestion that all libraries move to header only.
> This is notÂ great idea - but I won't address that here.
> I believe all these issues - and more - would disappear if we just
> stopped distributing binaries.Â Each user would be building his own
> boost version with (presumably) the same compiler.Â Since C++03
> compatible libraries are C++?? compatible, each library author can
> maintain the level of backward compatibility that he wishes.
> But if we're not going to distribute binaries, then users might as well
> just clone the latest "certified - good - tagged" version in the master
> branch from the github repo.Â That is, let's just stop or truncate the
> whole release circus.Â Replace with an occasional
> "certification/versioning procedure" which would make available a
> "squashed" master suitable for efficient cloning.
> This would make everyone's life easier.
Forcing end-users to build Boost themselves is not user friendly.
> Robert Ramey
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk