Subject: Re: [boost] [cmake] Pull request announcement
From: Alexander Grund (alexander.grund_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-09-14 14:05:12
The major problem I see are the variants.
- b2 can build multiple variants in one go (static, dynamic, runtimes...)
- Encoding these variants has to be reflected in the target names/aliases
CMake FindBoost solves this by requiring to set some variables to select
a set of variants and set the appropriate aliases to this set.
Think about how you reflect this in the CMake buildsystem. E.g. some
libraries may depend explicitly on a static or dynamic version of
another library (which can be expressed in bjam)
> The practical problem for most libraries, which are largely
> header-only, is converting the library jamfile for tests and building
> docs into CMake terms. Building non-header only libraries is actually
> much less of a problem for converting from Boost Build to CMake, even
> if it will get the vast majority of the comments
This won't be to bad either once the variants problem above is solved.
CTest is quite powerful so except for a few corner cases I expect it to
be straight forward.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk