Subject: Re: [boost] Making Boost invisible
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-09-25 17:28:53
On 9/25/18 8:08 PM, John Maddock via Boost wrote:
> Folks I have a bug report against Boost.Config that I don't know what
> (if anything) I should do about:
> The issue is this: lets say I build boost as static libraries with
> -fvisibilty=hidden because I want my application or shared library to
> *hide all boost symbols*.Â But there are some parts of boost which
> unconditionally make things visible - throw_exception is one particular
> culprit, but there are others, probably anything which uses
> BOOST_SYMBOL_VISIBLE in fact.
> Question: should we support this?Â If so how?Â The only thing I can
> think of is a user-defined macro which when set, disables symbol
I don't think we need to support this sice the user can already hide any
symbols with linker scripts.
Also, a thing to note is that I think there are a few places where Boost
relies on some symbols being defined by user, which means they should be
either defined in the same executable or exported from another. For
instance, tss_cleanup_implemented from Boost.Thread works like this.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk