Subject: Re: [boost] "peer reviewed" - Rights and responsibilities of maintainers
From: Alexander Grund (alexander.grund_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-10-16 11:01:27
>> So again: What is the Boost course on reviews of existing libraries
>> and the statement on the rights and responsibilities of maintainers?
"You are free to change your library in any way you wish". Ok...
BTW: Should this paragraph possibly get an update to refer to Github
(PRs, issues, ...) and how to handle patches from others?
It says "peer review is an important part of the Boost process" but only
relates to interface changes, not to internal changes although they
might break things or are supposed to fix them. "and to participate as
needed in discussions of your library on the boost mailing lists." could
be extended to include Github(?)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk