Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] The future and present of Boost
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-10-22 08:31:07

Next message: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [preprocessor] vc++ using the experimental preprocessor"
Previous message: Antony Polukhin: "[boost] [all] Hidden visibility is on by deafult"
In reply to: Antony Polukhin: "Re: [boost] The future and present of Boost"
Next in thread: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] The future and present of Boost"

On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 10:16, Antony Polukhin via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Another idea: how about dropping the "review manager" requirement? Allow
> library author to manage the review and require a separate manager only if
> the votes for library inclusion are doubtful or there's less than N votes.

+1

IOW, let's replace Review Manager with Review Arbiter, only called if necessary.

Best regards,

-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

Next message: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [preprocessor] vc++ using the experimental preprocessor"
Previous message: Antony Polukhin: "[boost] [all] Hidden visibility is on by deafult"
In reply to: Antony Polukhin: "Re: [boost] The future and present of Boost"
Next in thread: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] The future and present of Boost"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk