Subject: Re: [boost] The future and present of Boost
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-10-22 11:01:47
On 10/22/18 11:14 AM, Antony Polukhin via Boost wrote:
> Another idea: how about dropping the "review manager" requirement? Allow
> library author to manage the review and require a separate manager only if
> the votes for library inclusion are doubtful or there's less than N votes.
Review manager's responsibility is not to merely count the votes. The
person has to be a reasonable expert in the field, who should see pros
and cons of the library, weigh the points raised in the reviews and make
an informed decision (which might be against the votes, in principle).
And, obviously, the library author, despite any intended honesty, will
be biased in making such a decision.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk