Subject: Re: [boost] [release] 1.69.0 deadline for new libraries approaching
From: Stefan Seefeld (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-10-23 19:02:04
On 2018-10-23 02:58 PM, Raffi Enficiaud via Boost wrote:
> I cannot agree more. Also, I consider docbook as a perfect example of
> extremely complex API, and this is why I am very happy with quickbook.
> What is your feedback on asciidoc? would you recommend it?
Could we possibly get more off-topic ? The original discussion was about
supporting *build systems*. What tools you (or anyone else for that
matter) prefer is entirely irrelevant in that context, precisely because
a build system needs to support them all.
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk