Subject: Re: [boost] [release] 1.69.0 deadline for new libraries approaching
From: Raffi Enficiaud (raffi.enficiaud_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-10-23 19:22:59
On 23.10.18 21:02, Stefan Seefeld via Boost wrote:
> On 2018-10-23 02:58 PM, Raffi Enficiaud via Boost wrote:
>> I cannot agree more. Also, I consider docbook as a perfect example of
>> extremely complex API, and this is why I am very happy with quickbook.
>> What is your feedback on asciidoc? would you recommend it?
> Could we possibly get more off-topic ? The original discussion was about
> supporting *build systems*.
No. "[release] 1.69.0 deadline for new libraries approaching" is the
title of this thread.
I pointed you to cmake scripts that I wrote and that support building
Have you tried those scripts?
What tools you (or anyone else for that
> matter) prefer is entirely irrelevant in that context, precisely because
> a build system needs to support them all.
I remember some people interested in asciidoc, and I believe Rene Rivera
is/was one of them. As "a build system needs to support them all", I am
asking if he would recommend it, to know if this should be supported in
Is there anything wrong?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk