Re: [boost] The future and present of Boost

Subject: Re: [boost] The future and present of Boost
From: Miguel Ojeda (miguel.ojeda.sandonis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-10-25 09:24:23

On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 9:52 PM Mateusz Loskot via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Let's leave  Boost 1.x as is, as mixture of 03, 11, 14, etc.
> Let's revolutionarly reserve make Fosbury's flop reserving
> - Boost 17.x with `-std=c++17` as minimum
> - Boost 20.x with `-std=c++20` as minimum
> ...

Yes, please!

In the end, users' projects only use a single revision of the language.

Each library decides the minimum C++ version (like nowadays) and gets
included in the relevant versioned releases.

Cheers,
Miguel