Subject: Re: [boost] The future and present of Boost
From: Miguel Ojeda (miguel.ojeda.sandonis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-10-25 09:24:23
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 9:52 PM Mateusz Loskot via Boost
> Let's leave Boost 1.x as is, as mixture of 03, 11, 14, etc.
> Let's revolutionarly reserve make Fosbury's flop reserving
> - Boost 17.x with `-std=c++17` as minimum
> - Boost 20.x with `-std=c++20` as minimum
In the end, users' projects only use a single revision of the language.
Each library decides the minimum C++ version (like nowadays) and gets
included in the relevant versioned releases.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk