Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [release] many release notes pending
From: stefan (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-11-09 16:47:33

On 2018-11-09 11:41 a.m., Mateusz Loskot via Boost wrote:

> On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 at 17:06, James E. King III via Boost
> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 10:52 AM Vinnie Falco via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 2:43 AM Joaquin M López Muñoz via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>> Maybe some other protocol is needed for handling release notes.
>>> You mean, like, merging them?
>> I think a better strategy would be to define release notes in yaml (...)
> You mean, reno?


Let's not get side-tracked into another tools & languages discussion. I
think the high-order bit of the proposal is to further modularize the
process by letting individual projects manage *their* release notes,
then somehow syndicate them.

If we could already agree on that as a (mid-term) goal, that would be
great. The rest (languages, schemas, tools) can be discussed separately.


       ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at