|
|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [variant2] Need rationale for never-empty guarantee
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-03-02 12:53:18
Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:
> This is where my imagination fails me. I cannot imagine why upon bad_alloc
> I would be stopping the stack unwinding and determining size of my
> vectors.
Why would you need to be stopping stack unwinding in order to access a
variable? Variables can also be accessed during stack unwinding.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk