Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [variant2] Need rationale for never-empty guarantee
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-03-02 12:53:18

Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:

> This is where my imagination fails me. I cannot imagine why upon bad_alloc
> I would be stopping the stack unwinding and determining size of my
> vectors.

Why would you need to be stopping stack unwinding in order to access a
variable? Variables can also be accessed during stack unwinding.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at