Re: [boost] [variant2] Need rationale for never-empty guarantee

Subject: Re: [boost] [variant2] Need rationale for never-empty guarantee
From: Andrzej Krzemienski (akrzemi1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-03-03 20:58:51

sob., 2 mar 2019 o 14:04 Peter Dimov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
napisał(a):

> Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:
>
> > This is where my imagination fails me. I cannot imagine why upon
> bad_alloc
> > I would be stopping the stack unwinding and determining size of my
> > vectors.
>
> Why would you need to be stopping stack unwinding in order to access a
> variable? Variables can also be accessed during stack unwinding.
>

True.