Subject: Re: [boost] [Release] Boost 1.70.0 Beta 1 Release Candidate 2
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-03-10 17:33:48
Steven Watanabe wrote:
> > The purpose of that incrementing library-id, as far as I can infer, is
> > to enable two libraries to have their own private zlib dependencies.
> That's not really correct. The reason for the library-id is to make sure
> that target alternative selection only
happens at the top level on the /zlib//zlib target.
So it's intended for cases like
using zlib : 1.2.7 : <source>C:/Devel/src/zlib-1.2.7 : <toolset>msvc ;
using zlib : 1.2.7 : <source>/opt/src/zlib-1.2.7 : <toolset>gcc ;
Either way, in general, when I see lib1 having a CMake dependency on foo.1
and lib2 having a dependency on foo.2, ignoring the suffix doesn't seem
I could add a specific check for `zlib.*` and `bzip2.*` but this will only
work for Iostreams.
What's the intended path forward (in general, not specifically for the CMake
configurations) when a second Boost library wants to use zlib and bzip2?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk