Re: [boost] [variant2] Review of Variant2 started today : April 1 - April 10

Subject: Re: [boost] [variant2] Review of Variant2 started today : April 1 - April 10
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-04-02 13:11:08

On 4/2/19 3:55 PM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> Michael Caisse wrote:
> 
>> Note: The repository contains an expected implementation also; however,
>> that is not being considered in this review.
> 
> To be clear, I do intend to finish `expected` and provide it as part of the
> library.

Will it be reviewed separately?

Also, IMHO, it's better to have libraries more focused and fine grained. 
Why not have `expected` as a separate library?