Re: [boost] [variant2] Review of Variant2 started today : April 1 - April 10

Subject: Re: [boost] [variant2] Review of Variant2 started today : April 1 - April 10
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-04-02 13:18:04

Andrey Semashev wrote:
> On 4/2/19 3:55 PM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> > Michael Caisse wrote:
> >
> >> Note: The repository contains an expected implementation also; however, 
> >> that is not being considered in this review.
> >
> > To be clear, I do intend to finish `expected` and provide it as part of 
> > the library.
>
> Will it be reviewed separately?

No. If you don't like it, now is the time to reject.

> Also, IMHO, it's better to have libraries more focused and fine grained. 
> Why not have `expected` as a separate library?

expected<T, E...> is basically a variant, with a slightly different 
interface.