Re: [boost] Enabling spectre mitigation in boost libraries

Subject: Re: [boost] Enabling spectre mitigation in boost libraries
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-04-06 17:32:16

On 4/6/19 9:46 AM, John Maddock via Boost wrote:
> 

> One thing we could look at for future releases would be to provide 
> differently-named binaries for /Qspectre.  Anyone else have thoughts on 
> that?

Hmmm - I question I'm too lazy to investigate so I'll just ask you. 
Does boost build not provide the option of specifying that the 
invocation specify the name of the binaries or perhaps some root?  Would 
this not get boost off the hook for addressing special requirements like 
this?

Robert Ramey