Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Enabling spectre mitigation in boost libraries
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-04-06 17:32:16

On 4/6/19 9:46 AM, John Maddock via Boost wrote:

> One thing we could look at for future releases would be to provide
> differently-named binaries for /Qspectre.  Anyone else have thoughts on
> that?

Hmmm - I question I'm too lazy to investigate so I'll just ask you.
Does boost build not provide the option of specifying that the
invocation specify the name of the binaries or perhaps some root? Would
this not get boost off the hook for addressing special requirements like

Robert Ramey

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at