Subject: Re: [boost] Enabling spectre mitigation in boost libraries
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-04-06 18:14:38
On Sat, Apr 6, 2019, 1:11 PM Robert Ramey via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
> On 4/6/19 9:46 AM, John Maddock via Boost wrote:
> > One thing we could look at for future releases would be to provide
> > differently-named binaries for /Qspectre. Anyone else have thoughts on
> > that?
> Hmmm - I question I'm too lazy to investigate so I'll just ask you.
> Does boost build not provide the option of specifying that the
> invocation specify the name of the binaries or perhaps some root? Would
> this not get boost off the hook for addressing special requirements like
Yes, both of those features are available.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk