|
Boost :
|
- Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: bcp namespace aliasing broken, impacts package providers, shared libraries unusable since 1.69"
- Previous message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [iostreams] Interest in multithreaded lzma filter?"
- In reply to: Mathias Gaunard: "bcp namespace aliasing broken, impacts package providers, shared libraries unusable since 1.69"
- Next in thread: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: bcp namespace aliasing broken, impacts package providers, shared libraries unusable since 1.69"
- Reply: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: bcp namespace aliasing broken, impacts package providers, shared libraries unusable since 1.69"
- Maybe reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: bcp namespace aliasing broken, impacts package providers, shared libraries unusable since 1.69"
- Maybe reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: bcp namespace aliasing broken, impacts package providers, shared libraries unusable since 1.69"
- Maybe reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: bcp namespace aliasing broken, impacts package providers, shared libraries unusable since 1.69"
- Maybe reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: bcp namespace aliasing broken, impacts package providers, shared libraries unusable since 1.69"
On 24/05/2019 09:58, Mathias Gaunard via Boost wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to point out that bcp namespace aliasing has been broken for
> quite a while, which impacts package providers of Boost which choose
> to package it with a versioned namespace.
> We should try to fix to enable more people to upgrade.
>
> The bug has been reported March 2018 on trac
> https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/13460
> Then again by me this week on github https://github.com/boostorg/bcp/issues/4
I've seen the git issue but missed the earlier one, apologies for that.
>
> Things have been made worse since 1.69 because libraries now build
> with visibility hidden by default, which means that with this bug
> symbols don't get exported and nothing links.
>
> Also I would argue that this set-up should be tested as part of the
> release validation process.
> The boost build system is arcane enough that we don't need a pretty
> standard build configuration to be subtly broken for more than a year.
>
> Could we try to address this before 1.71?
We can try, PR's would be welcome.
Best, John.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
- Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: bcp namespace aliasing broken, impacts package providers, shared libraries unusable since 1.69"
- Previous message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [iostreams] Interest in multithreaded lzma filter?"
- In reply to: Mathias Gaunard: "bcp namespace aliasing broken, impacts package providers, shared libraries unusable since 1.69"
- Next in thread: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: bcp namespace aliasing broken, impacts package providers, shared libraries unusable since 1.69"
- Reply: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: bcp namespace aliasing broken, impacts package providers, shared libraries unusable since 1.69"
- Maybe reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: bcp namespace aliasing broken, impacts package providers, shared libraries unusable since 1.69"
- Maybe reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: bcp namespace aliasing broken, impacts package providers, shared libraries unusable since 1.69"
- Maybe reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: bcp namespace aliasing broken, impacts package providers, shared libraries unusable since 1.69"
- Maybe reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: bcp namespace aliasing broken, impacts package providers, shared libraries unusable since 1.69"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk