Re: Interest in updated, standalone iterator_facade library?

From: Brook Milligan (brook_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-08-14 21:55:24

> On Aug 12, 2019, at 9:46 AM, Zach Laine via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:22 AM Zach Laine <whatwasthataddress_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
> 
>> I consider it to be ready, as-is.  There may be bugs lurking that need to
>> be fixed, but I don't know of any.  I can write every kind of iterator I've
>> ever needed to write (which is a lot).  This includes all the iterator
>> categories, plus proxy versions of each, and even weird stuff like
>> back_insert_iterator.

Have you considered an analogy of the Boost iterator_adaptor?  That might reduce boilerplate in some useful cases.

Cheers,
Brook