Boost logo

Boost :

From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-10-16 17:31:59

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 2:51 AM Paul A Bristow via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Since the Standard seems to suggest to me, (ill-informed on this language
> lawyers delight) that using keyword final where implemented, that that is
> the Right Thing To Do long-term.
> So I favour implementing BOOST_HAS_FINAL and using it in the code.

The problem is that this is not a solution for old code, since it may be
used with old compiler versions, which requires the warning to be silenced
anyway. Once the warning is silenced, adding final would not be needed.
Can't hurt though.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at