From: Zach Laine (whatwasthataddress_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-10-30 15:48:51
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 7:59 AM Klaim - JoÃ«l Lamotte <mjklaim_at_[hidden]>
> On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 at 03:11, Zach Laine via Boost-users <
> boost-users_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> About 14 months ago I posted the same thing. There was significant work
>> that needed to be done to Boost.Text (the proposed library), and I was a
>> bit burned out.
>> Now I've managed to make the necessary changes, and I feel the library is
>> ready for review, if there is interest.
>> This library, in part, is something I want to standardize.
> (as a power user)
> I would be interested to have such library in Boost and already had plan
> to try Boost.Text in my next C++ project with text.
> I am following the discussions happening in SG16 and understand that there
> are some differences with the parts that will be proposed for
> standardisation (as ThePHD explains in his talk).
> Though honestly both approaches seems to solve my problems so I'm open to
> trying both. If boost.text is stable today, I'm happy to use it (at least
> to replace ICU and have a proper unicode text type).
Yes, JeanHeyd and I started with very different approaches, but we're
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk