From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-11-15 12:57:43
Edward Diener wrote:
> I was just pointing out that Boost PP is hardly the only Boost library
> which has lots of stale branches. If it is not against Boost policy to
> delete old, stale branches I will be glad to do so, but I was just
> looking for some clarification from other Boost developers first.
It is not against any policy. A maintainer is free to delete old
branches. Only develop and master need to be around.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk