Boost logo

Boost :

From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-11-15 12:57:43

Edward Diener wrote:
> I was just pointing out that Boost PP is hardly the only Boost library
> which has lots of stale branches. If it is not against Boost policy to
> delete old, stale branches I will be glad to do so, but I was just
> looking for some clarification from other Boost developers first.

It is not against any policy. A maintainer is free to delete old
branches. Only develop and master need to be around.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at