From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-11-15 13:33:04
>> I was just pointing out that Boost PP is hardly the only Boost library
>> which has lots of stale branches. If it is not against Boost policy to
>> delete old, stale branches I will be glad to do so, but I was just
>> looking for some clarification from other Boost developers first.
> I believe, beyond master and develop, your usage of branches is
> completely at your (project members') discretion. There's no Boost-wide
It is surely sensible that fully merged branches be deleted as a matter
I very rarely keep around fully merged branches, but I do occasionally
do so mainly to retain a waypoint reference.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk