From: Bjorn Reese (breese_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-11-17 11:36:35
On 11/16/19 7:09 PM, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:
> My JSON library is going to propose to Boost soon, is there anyone who
> might be willing and able to function in the role of review manager?
Before we get to that point, there are some questions that the community
These days there are a huge number of JSON libraries out there. Some
focus on features (e.g. binary JSON or JSONPath), others on performance,
and others on user-friendliness. What competitive edge should a
potential Boost JSON library offer?
Which use cases should a potential Boost JSON library support? Should
the library work seemlessly with standard algorithms? Should it be
possible to create parser combinators? Should there be a JSON archive
for Boost.Serialization? Should it replace parts of Boost.PropertyTree?
PS: On a procedural note, you need an endorsement of the library before
seeking a review manager.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk