From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-11-18 00:08:00
On 11/17/19 3:52 PM, Richard Hodges via Boost wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Nov 2019 at 19:09, Vinnie Falco via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Iâm probably not qualified to engage in review
LOL - of course you're qualified. We always need more reviewers who
actually have some real world experience using similar libraries.
> This is a great compliment to beast when writing c++ programs that must
> interface with node et al. Something I do a lot of.
> Until now I have used nlohmann because itâs easy.
Right - we can always reviews from people who know what it means for
something to be easy.
> If this library is as
> easy but more efficient, then we all win.
>> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk