From: degski (degski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-12-04 13:42:11
On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 01:41, Peter Dimov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Krystian Stasiowski wrote:
> > - Empty class specialization for N = 0: Implemented
> I don't like this change. A special case for close to zero benefit that
> changes the semantics of data() to not be unique per instance.
Storing the size (as capacity - size) in the last char for N < 256 will
> more impact, but I'm not sure that it too is worth the added complexity.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
-- @realdegski https://brave.com/google-gdpr-workaround/ "We value your privacy, click here!" Sod off! - degski "Anyone who believes that exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist" - Kenneth E. Boulding "Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell" - Edward P. Abbey
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk