Boost logo

Boost :

From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-12-04 14:03:44


On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 11:42 PM Peter Dimov via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I don't like this change. A special case for close to zero benefit that
> changes the semantics of data() to not be unique per instance.

I don't feel strongly about it either way, but since when is data()
guaranteed to be unique per instance?

Thanks


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk