|
Boost : |
From: live man (satyaprakash.prasad_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-01-03 14:45:28
Yes. we have a complete TCP/IP suite stack or make use of FOSS technology
ex lwIP. (*lightweight IP*)
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 11:53 PM Richard Hodges via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Would need more detail in order to provide help.
>
> Does your proprietary socket library provide the Berkeley sockets
> interface?
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Jan 2020 at 18:53, live man via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have been using Boost for our firmware product which runs in ARM
> > processor.
> >
> > However for development we make use of Visual Studio IDE. We also have
> our
> > own TCP / IP suite which defines its own socket.h file.
> >
> > We are facing issue related to using Boost ASIO in Windows development
> > platform. It seems that the library by default includes windows
> networking
> > header files - which we do not want. Instead we want Boost ASIO to make
> our
> > own library socket headers and declaration.
> >
> > We noticed that if we include Boost ASIO and our TCP / IP socket
> > declaration we get re-definition error and compilation fails with lots of
> > errors?
> >
> > Please let us know how we can resolve the issue with the objective
> > mentioned above?
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Prakash
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Unsubscribe & other changes:
> > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
> >
> --
> Richard Hodges
> hodges.r_at_[hidden]
> office: +442032898513
> home: +376841522
> mobile: +376380212
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk