Re: Future directions for Boost.Math and Boost.Multiprecision

From: Damian Vicino (damian_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-01-16 13:45:44

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020, 07:57 Paul A Bristow via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> Trying to obtain some user (and potential user) feedback, and guidance on
> future
> work,
>
> a discussion at   https://github.com/boostorg/math/issues/303   has been
> started.
>
> If you (or your friends and colleagues) have ideas for mathy things like
> 'special' functions, statistical distributions, tools like integration,
> curve
> fitting, signal processing ... that the current libraries do not meet,
> please
> feel free to contribute to this wish-list collection of ideas.
>

I think it may be worth to talk about how real could integrate with math
before real is proposed for review.

https://github.com/BoostGSoC19/Real

>