From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-01-23 22:57:45
On 1/23/2020 2:29 PM, John Maddock via Boost wrote:
> On 23/01/2020 19:19, Rene Rivera via Boost wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 1:13 PM Edward Diener via Boost <
>> boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> If some compiler vendor takes a version of Boost and makes changes to
>>> that version of Boost to suit the particular compiler, while
>>> distributing that version with full source code as an optional part of
>>> some release of that compiler, does this mean that the code is now
>>> proprietary for that compiler vendor ? Or does the code still remain
>>> open source so that a programmer can use the changes made to update his
>>> own version of a Boost release or provide PRs to some later release of
>>> Boost based on the code in the compiler vendor's release ?
>> Depends entirely on what license they made the changes available as.
> Yup, if they don't copyright the changes, then it's still all BSL, but
> they are allowed to make their changes proprietary.
> If you're thinking of moving changes upstream into Boost, then I suggest
> you just drop them a line and see how they feel about that.
Where would I be expected to find some indication whether they have made
their changes proprietary ? Is it required to be in each source file, or
is it required to be in some other place related to the Boost
distribution they supply, and if so where ?
I have been in contact with one of their representatives, so I will ask
him point blank about it, but I did want to know in advance if there was
any requirement they specify their copyright changes in some particular
place related to their distribution of the source code.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk