Re: Cryptography for Boost.

From: Mike (mike.dev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-02-24 10:34:57

> Gesendet: Samstag, 22. Februar 2020 um 10:31 Uhr
> Von: "Mikhail Komarov via Boost" <boost_at_[hidden]>
>
> 
> Okay. I consider such a small of responses as if there was no point in discussing hypothetical library without actual code. I’ill come up with a Boost-ified version hopefully next week and maybe that would bake some discussion.
> 

Don't think it has to be boostified but some code and examples to get an idea 
about the features and API design would indeed be useful.

I can't speak for the boost community, but I guess another big question mark is probably 
long term support and response to security vulnerabilities. I wouldn't be surprised, 
if people are reluctant to base the security of their communication on a lesser known library, 
when they can't be confident that bugs and vulnerabilities are getting fixed quickly.

Best

Mike