From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-04-03 18:13:45
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > (Also... before spending too much time on this, consider trying 1.73 as
> > well.)
> I will, although I would be surprised if these problems have just gone
> away by themselves, given that they seem to be related to downstream
> customizations for Fedora, and so not reported upstream to Boost.
They won't... but new ones may appear :-) as we changed the directory for
mpi.so because it wasn't appropriate for Boost to install a file named
`mpi.so` into the default destination /usr/lib.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk