From: Christopher Kormanyos (e_float_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-05-23 13:13:33
> general feelings about Boost perceived lack> of modernization
> ... proposal for an epoch-based organization> of Boost libraries
I would welcome this. It does, however, sound likea reather large undertaking.
In a smaller but similar situation, I was once motivatedin my own research to identify various time epochsin C++.
Probably similar to others, I identified for my purposes:
1) Pre-C++11 (basically C++03)2) C++11 but no more.3) C++ newest
Intuitively, I think number 2 is a great first stepin moving and migrating toward moden C++.Most compilers are conformant with modernC++11 now, even embedded systems compilers.
Kind regards, Chris
Am Samstag, 23. Mai 2020, 11:57:26 MESZ hat Joaquin M LÃ³pez MuÃ±oz via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> Folgendes geschrieben:
Prompted by general feelings about Boost perceived lack of modernization
and internal "bloat",
and after an explicit survey on what users dislike about Boost , I
decided to try and write a more
or less fleshed out proposal for an epoch-based organization of Boost
libraries. I've extensively
tested and refined the proposal during discussions on Reddit and the
Boost Slack channel,
and I feel this is now ready for presentation at the mailing list:
I hope the proposal can start a productive conversation. Looking forward
to your feedback.
JoaquÃn M LÃ³pez MuÃ±oz
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk