From: Joaquin M LÃ³pez MuÃ±oz (joaquinlopezmunoz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-05-24 16:44:43
El 24/05/2020 a las 16:15, Peter Dimov via Boost escribiÃ³:
> Joaquin M LÃ³pez MuÃ±oz wrote:
>> Boost.Regex is admittedly a controversial point (as mentionedin the
>> proposal) due to
>> its superior quality to some std implementations.
> There's nothing controversial about it.
I meant controversial as for epoch asignment within this proposal.
> As of 2020, it should always be preferred over std::regex.
I shouldn't comment on opinions outside the scope of the proposal lest
we wander off, but obviously not everybody agrees always with this
assessment, not even within Boost:
That said, I'm with you Boost.Regex is a superb library.
JoaquÃn M LÃ³pez MuÃ±oz
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk