Re: [atomic] Bikeshedding over address-free waiting/notifying operation names

From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-06-01 11:17:36

On 2020-06-01 13:50, degski wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 31 May 2020 at 16:05, Andrey Semashev via Boost 
> <boost_at_[hidden] <mailto:boost_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
> 
>     The "address-free"
>     term comes from the C++ standard, but the resulting names seem a bit
>     long. Maybe there are better suggestions?
> 
> 
> What about "global_"-prefix or "_system"-post-fix ("_sys")?

Hmm, that doesn't quite communicate the difference from the default 
operations.