From: Phil Endecott (spam_from_boost_dev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-06-01 12:05:41
Andrey Semashev wrote:
> As some of you may know, C++20 added new waiting/notifying operations to
> std::atomic: wait, notify_one and notify_all. These operations are not
> address-free, i.e. their implementation is allowed to use process-local
> addresses of the atomics as keys. In particular, it means you can't use
> them for inter-process communication.
That's useful to know!
> In Boost.Atomic I intend to provide address-free variants as well, where
> possible, and I'm thinking about the naming scheme for them. Currently,
> I'm using the "_address_free" suffix, so we have wait_address_free,
> notify_one_address_free and notify_all_address_free. The "address-free"
> term comes from the C++ standard, but the resulting names seem a bit
> long. Maybe there are better suggestions?
P.S. it's not "bikeshedding", names are important.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk