From: Zach Laine (whatwasthataddress_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-06-16 15:54:56
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:20 AM Phil Endecott via Boost
> Dear All,
> Looking at the proposed Boost.Text source, I find that:
> 1. Many files don't have a copyright header. Random example:
> I guess this is an oversight and is easily fixed.
Yes, definitely an oversight. I'll fix these.
> 2. Some files have a copyright header which is not the Boost
> licence. Example:
> This one has a requirement that binary distribution includes the
> copyright notice, which is not a requirement of the Boost licence,
> and will be problematic for some users.
> Are the only affected files the SIMD implementation, (c) Robert N
> Steagall? If so, can this be disabled (by default?) by the user
> to avoid the copyright notice requirement?
I can ask Bob for his permission to release these under the Boost
license. I'm certain he'll say yes.
> 3. The documentation includes a Unicode copyright notice:
> This also includes a requirement that the copyright notice is included
> in data files, software or associated documentation, whatever that means.
I think it means exactly what I already did -- I put the copyright
notice in the associated documentation. Note that this code comes
from ICU, and Boost already has an optional dependency on ICU.
> It's not clear to me what this actually covers; again, can some
> functionality (e.g. UTF-N-to-M conversion without normalisation) work
> without the Unicode data?
It covers the files in include/boost/text/detail/icu. Those files
provide normalization. The transcoding stuff is unaffected.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk