From: Gavin Lambert (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-06-25 23:52:32
On 26/06/2020 00:07, Phil Endecott wrote:
> # It is ok to redistribute this file "solely for informational
> # purposes in the creation of products supporting the Unicode Standard".
> # We don't nee to add a Boost License to this file: boostinspect:nolicense.
> Note that I don't know who wrote that, nor where the "solely for
> informational purposes..." quote comes from.Â And what are
> "informational purposes" anyway? - it doesn't sound to me as
> if that were written by a lawyer.
> This really needs an expert to look at it, IMO.
That text appears at https://spdx.org/licenses/Unicode-TOU.html
Although that is perhaps an older version of the Unicode license, as it
doesn't match what is at https://www.unicode.org/license.html (or at
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk