Re: Boost, not LEWG

From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-06-29 01:25:37

On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 9:19 PM Emil Dotchevski wrote:
> Independently, we can work to make Boost better, though I am not sure how.
> I agree that the mailing list is archaic, but it works great, and I don't
> think it's an obstacle for anyone. Perhaps I'm wrong about this.

The concrete items mentioned that have been known to inhibit
participation appear to be:
- Mailing lists
- Boost.Build

Not sure what to do about the second.

I'm happy to help anyone (LEWG or otherwise) produce Jamfiles for
their prospective libraries for building, testing, and documentation
generation (if Doxygen, Asciidoc).

Glen