Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Richard Hodges (hodges.r_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-07-02 21:41:24

On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 20:28, Robert Ramey via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

Right, and working under this sort of pressure, it seems pretty likely
> that something will be broken.
>

I thought it worth mentioning that:

* We are only one test failure away from a flawless (zero regression)
test.

* That failure only occurs in asio::co_spawn (c++20 coroutines) when
BOOST_ASIO_NO_TS_EXECUTORS is defined.

* Chris has been very responsive to our bug reports.

* The bug is more of an oversight than a logic error.

* Boost.Beast's test suite represents a very thorough workout of the Asio
executor model, which is the element being updated in this release.

I imagine this will be solved by tomorrow.

It was not my intent to alarm the community, merely to keep everyone
informed as to progress.

>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>

-- 
Richard Hodges
hodges.r_at_[hidden]
office: +442032898513
home: +376841522
mobile: +376380212

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view