From: Dennis Luehring (dl.soluz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-08-12 14:17:17
>Looking at the history of boost/config/auto_link.hpp,
>1.70 didn't autolink under Clang at all
>and since 1.71 Clang autolinks to clangw libraries.
>So I don't see why 1.73 and 1.74 would differ.
Clang or Clang-cl?
a freshly build 1.73 and 1.74-rc2 showing exact that
both boost versions are only build with vc141 - there are only vc141 libs available
if using boost 1.73 it makes no difference in building with microsoft-cl or clang-cl
if using boost 1.74 - boost will ask for clangw10 libs
Am 12.08.2020 um 16:08 schrieb Peter Dimov via Boost:
> Dennis Luehring wrote:
> > until 1.74 there was no need to prepare a descent build of boost for clang
> Looking at the history of boost/config/auto_link.hpp, 1.70 didn't autolink
> under Clang at all, and since 1.71 Clang autolinks to clangw libraries. So I
> don't see why 1.73 and 1.74 would differ.
> If you want to override this, #define BOOST_LIB_TOOLSET to vc141 (if using
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk