Re: You Won't Believe This! JSON library had no review manager for 10 months now.

From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-08-22 20:07:26

On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 12:25 PM Janek Kozicki via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> How about this :)
>
> Mateusz Loskot via Boost said:     (by the date of Sat, 22 Aug 2020
20:46:16 +0200)
>
> > On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 at 20:38, Vinnie Falco via Boost
> > <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 9:48 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > > > Vinnie, please stop posting messages with clickbait or obscure
topics.
> > > > This is not going to help you find a review manager, quite the
opposite.
> > >
> > > My DEEPEST apologies for the transgression. But maybe... just a
> > > thought here, you could forgive me seeing as to how I have been asking
> > > for a review manager for 10 months now?
> >
> > If a review manager can submit a review, precedents in the past are
known,
> > then, perhaps, a review wizard can be a review manager ;)
> >
> > One way or another, I believe there is room for further clarification
> > of the review rules.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > --
> > Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

As far as I am concerned, the review manager must have deep understanding
of the problem domain and not be in a position to gain from either
acceptance or rejection. The review wizards' approval certifies that that's
the case. Technically, as long as it _is_ the case, I don't see why a
wizard can't be a manager.