|
Boost : |
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-08-23 22:37:02
Mike wrote:
> A wrapper module has the advantage, that it creates a named module...
Depending on how chips fall I'm not sure this would necessarily be such an
advantage. Importing the header will work as long as including it does,
whereas a named module requires some sort of a module mapper, which in the
overengineered gcc implementation makes you start a local server.
> and only exports what is explicitly specified,
Yes, that's an unquestionable advantage.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk